AOR

The Archives of Ophthalmological Research aims to publish issues related to publish articles of the highest scientific and clinical value at an international level, and accepts articles on these topics. The target audience of the journal included specialists and physicians working in ophthalmology, and other health professionals interested in these fields.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Assessing the informational quality of TikTok videos on refractive surgery: a comparative study
Aims: Evaluate the quality and reliability of TikTok videos on refractive surgery (LASIK, PRK, SMILE), comparing content from healthcare professionals and patients, and assess TikTok's role in disseminating ophthalmological information.
Methods: Analyzed 200 TikTok videos (98 by physicians, 102 by patients) using DISCERN, JAMA, and Global Quality Score (GQS). Recorded and compared view count, likes, comments, and video length. Examined correlations between these metrics and quality scores.
Results: Mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores for all videos were 44 ± 13.2, 2.27 ± 0.94, and 2.86 ± 1.22, indicating moderate quality. Physician-uploaded videos scored higher on all measures. Strong positive correlation between video length and quality scores. Strong negative correlation between engagement metrics (views, likes, comments) and DISCERN scores. Physician videos had higher view counts, longer durations, and more comments, while patient videos received more likes.
Conclusion: TikTok videos on refractive surgery generally show moderate quality and reliability. Content from healthcare professionals is superior in quality and informativeness. However, higher engagement does not equate to better information quality. These findings underscore the necessity for patients to critically evaluate social media content when seeking information on refractive surgery. Larger, comprehensive studies are needed for more definitive insights. The results guide patients in making informed decisions and help healthcare professionals develop effective social media strategies for disseminating accurate ophthalmological information.


1. Dumbrell D, Steele R. The changing nature of health information dissemination through the role of social media. Appl Mech Mater. 2013;411:110-114.
2. Kong W, Song S, Zhao YC, Zhu Q, Sha L. TikTok as a health information source: assessment of the quality of information in diabetes-related videos. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e30409.
3. Chang JY, Lin PY, Hsu CC, Liu CJL. Comparison of clinical outcomes of LASIK, Trans-PRK, and SMILE for correction of myopia. J Chin Med Assoc. 2022;85(2):234-240.
4. Afful-Dadzie E, Afful-Dadzie A. Social media in health communication: a literature review of information quality. Health Inf Manag J. 2023;52(1):45-56.
5. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111.
6. Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J, Gustin T, Lévêque M. Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(1-2):31-39.
7. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor-let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244-1245.
8. Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):395-403.
9. Sampige R, Rodgers EG, Huang A, Zhu D. Education and misinformation: exploring ophthalmology content on TikTok. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024;13(1):97-112.
10. Haddad FF, Saade JS. LASIK videos on TikTok: a content analysis of the top 100 videos. J Ophthalmol. 2024;2024(1):8810500.
11. Siegal AR, Ferrer FA, Baldisserotto E, Malhotra NR. The assessment of TikTok as a source of quality health information on varicoceles. Urology. 2023;175:170-174.
12. Villa-Ruiz C, Kassamali B, Mazori DR, Min M, Cobos G, LaChance A. Overview of TikTok’s most viewed dermatologic content and assessment of its reliability. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(1):273-274.
13. Ostrovsky AM, Chen JR. TikTok and its role in COVID-19 information propagation. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(5):730.
14. Kong KA, Hu A. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(2):272-278.
15. Gong X, Dong B, Li L, Shen D, Rong Z. TikTok video as a health education source of information on heart failure in China: a content analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1315393.
16. Dimitroyannis R, Fenton D, Cho S, et al. A social media quality review of popular sinusitis videos on TikTok. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;170(5):145-166.
17. Chen Q, Min C, Zhang W, Ma X, Evans R. Factors driving citizen engagement with government TikTok accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic: model development and analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):21463.
18. Du RC, Zhang Y, Wang MH, Lu NH, Hu Y. TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: a content and quality analysis. Helicobacter. 2023;28(5):13007.
19. Yeung A, Ng E, Abi-Jaoude E. TikTok and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional study of social media content quality. Can J Psychiatry. 2022;67(12):899-906.
20. Dimitroyannis R, Cho S, Thodupunoori S, et al. Does my kid have an ear infection? An analysis of pediatric acute otitis media videos on TikTok. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(12):5184-5192.
Volume 2, Issue 1, 2025
Page : 9-13
_Footer