AOR

The Archives of Ophthalmological Research aims to publish issues related to publish articles of the highest scientific and clinical value at an international level, and accepts articles on these topics. The target audience of the journal included specialists and physicians working in ophthalmology, and other health professionals interested in these fields.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Public interest in ophthalmic imaging: a google trends analysis of diagnostic modalities from 2005 to 2025
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of public interest in ophthalmic imaging modalities between 2005 and 2025 using Google Trends data, with comparisons across countries, languages, and disease-related contexts.
Methods: Google Trends was used to analyze Relative Search Volume (RSV) data for eight ophthalmic imaging modalities: Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA), fluorescein angiography, fundus photography, ocular ultrasound, corneal topography, orbital Computed Tomography (CT), and orbital Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Terms were searched in both Turkish and English. Five countries were assessed: Turkey, the United States, Germany, India, and Japan. Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) was calculated for each term. Comparative analyses were performed by language, disease focus (e.g., macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy), and pre- versus post-COVID-19 periods.
Results: Most imaging terms showed a notable rise in RSV, particularly OCT, fundus photography, and OCTA. The highest CAGR was seen for OCT (+8.1%, India). Turkish terms had consistently lower RSV than their English equivalents, although substantial growth was observed for searches corresponding to OCT and fluorescein angiography after 2015. COVID-19 led to a temporary decline in search activity, followed by a strong rebound. Corneal topography and ocular ultrasound showed more modest but steadily increasing interest.
Conclusion: Public interest in ophthalmic imaging has significantly increased over two decades. The growing attention to OCT and OCTA reflects rising awareness of non-invasive retinal diagnostics. Lower interest in Turkish terms highlights the need to improve local-language health education. Digital data tools like Google Trends may serve as valuable instruments in tracking and enhancing ophthalmic public health awareness.


1. Bennett TJ, Barry CJ. Ophthalmic imaging today: an ophthalmic photographer’s viewpoint-a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(1):2-13. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01812.x
2. Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 2015;35(11):2163-2180. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000765
3. Fan R, Chan TCY, Prakash G, Jhanji V. Applications of corneal topography and tomography: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46(2): 133-146. doi:10.1111/ceo.13136
4. Wu F, Wang Q, Zheng T, Wang X, Lin C. Diagnostic accuracy of B-scan ultrasound for posterior segment ocular disorders: a meta-analysis. Doc Ophthalmol. 2025;150(2):73-85. doi:10.1007/s10633-025-10005-6
5. Mavragani A. Infodemiology and infoveillance: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e16206. doi:10.2196/16206
6. Lin JC, Jiang L, Scott IU, Greenberg PB. COVID-19 and public interest in ophthalmic services and conditions. R I Med J (2013). 2021;104(1):61-64.
7. Wikström L, Schildmeijer K, Nylander EM, Eriksson K. Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on e-health applications designed for self-care in association with surgery: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1-20. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07718-8
8. Ateşman E. Türkçe’de okunabilirliğin ölçülmesi: bir okunabilirlik formülü. Dil Derg. 1997;(67):45-49.
9. Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas for navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75. Naval Technical Training Command; 1975. doi:10.21236/ADA006655
10. Kuhn M. Imaging in the 21st century. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998; 18(2):210-223. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.1998.00361.x
11. Zeppieri M, Marsili S, Enaholo ES, et al. Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a brief look at the uses and technological evolution of ophthalmology. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(12):2114. doi:10.3390/medicina59122114
12. de Carlo TE, Romano A, Waheed NK, Duker JS. A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int J Retina Vitreous. 2015;1:1-15. doi:10.1186/s40942-015-0005-8
13. Arya M, Rashad R, Sorour O, Moult EM, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Optical coherence tomography angiography flow speed mapping technology for retinal diseases. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(12):875-882. doi:10.1080/17434440.2018.1548932
14. Boruah DK, Vishwakarma D, Gogoi P, Lal NR, Deuri A. Utility of high-resolution ultrasonography in the evaluation of posterior segment ocular lesions using sensitivity and specificity. Acta Med Litu. 2023;30(2):171-180. doi:10.15388/Amed.2023.30.2.9
15. Chaudhury M, Parida B, Panigrahi SK. Diagnostic accuracy of B-scan ultrasonography for posterior segment eye disorders: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021;15(10):7. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2021/49509.15523
16. Mirza E, Mirza GD, Belviranli S, Oltulu R, Okka M. Ocular-symptoms-related Google search trends during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(6):2213-2223. doi:10.1007/s10792-021-01782-5 </ol> <p>
Volume 3, Issue 1, 2026
Page : 6-9
_Footer